A project of this size will cover several years, with multiple
iterations, elements and cross-cutting themes. Hopefully, this brief
narrative and graphic illustration (see below) will allow others
to grasp the long term vision of what the NLIST project hopes to
achieve.
In order to be more successful with
program implementation, state science supervisors need to better
understand the systemic nature of their work and to approach it
with more utilitarian guidelines. It is necessary to take the intent
of the National Science Education Standards and ask the very hard
and practical sense question, "What way do the key system elements
need to change to implement 'Science as Inquiry'"? In other words,
"What needs to change in the professional programs and certification
standards for teachers?", 'What different kinds of instructional
resources are needed?" "What are the implications for educational
leadership?" All these system elements, coordinated around the concept
of "Science as Inquiry", will evolve into guidelines and rubrics
for instructional resources . An important key to the success of
the effort will be the development of a utilitarian instrument,
that illustrates the "how to do" of educational
reform and not a theoretical set of guidelines reiterating the "what
to do" of educational reform.
In essence, this project has already
operationally define Science as Inquiry and is using this definition
to develop procedures for the alignment of instruction resources.
This foundational process, for developing criteria, indicators,
and a rubric, lays out the general process as to how all system
elements (see graphical below) will be developed and used for appropriately
supporting the implementation of "Science as Inquiry"...over time
and with adequate recourses.
The
following six systemic areas have been identified as essential components
in changing a system. Our vision will be to apply the foundational
"Science as Inquiry" definition and use it to create rubrics
over time to objectively align these system areas: Administrative
Leadership, Technology Infrastructure, Professional Development,
Community Involvement and Designed Facilities.
The image to the right depicts the
"Big Picture" of all the systemic elements that will be addressed
over the entire life of the NLIST mission. We are currently in Phase
4 of the project. Full explanations of phase one through seven are
available by clicking on the hexagon for each. (can't see the picture?
get
Flash)